English
Language : 

ISL6323B Datasheet, PDF (24/35 Pages) Intersil Corporation – Monolithic Dual PWM Hybrid Controller Powering AMD SVI Split-Plane and PVI Uniplane Processors
ISL6323B
OVERCURRENT PROTECTION IN POWER SAVINGS
MODE
While in Power Savings Mode, the OCP trip point will be
lower than when running in Normal Mode. Equation 20, with
N = 1, will yield the OCP trip point for the Core regulator
while in Power Savings mode.
If an overcurrent event should occur while the system is in
Power Savings Mode, the ISL6323B will restart in the
Normal state with the PSI_L bit set to 1.
Individual Channel Overcurrent Limiting
The ISL6323B has the ability to limit the current in each
individual channel of the Core regulator without shutting
down the entire regulator. This is accomplished by
continuously comparing the sensed currents of each channel
with a constant 140µA OCL reference current. If a channel’s
individual sensed current exceeds this OCL limit, the UGATE
signal of that channel is immediately forced low, and the
LGATE signal is forced high. This turns off the upper
MOSFET(s), turns on the lower MOSFET(s), and stops the
rise of current in that channel, forcing the current in the
channel to decrease. That channel’s UGATE signal will not
be able to return high until the sensed channel current falls
back below the 140µA reference.
General Design Guide
This design guide is intended to provide a high-level
explanation of the steps necessary to create a multiphase
power converter. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with
many of the basic skills and techniques referenced below. In
addition to this guide, Intersil provides complete reference
designs that include schematics, bills of materials, and example
board layouts for all common microprocessor applications.
Power Stages
The first step in designing a multiphase converter is to
determine the number of phases. This determination depends
heavily on the cost analysis which in turn depends on system
constraints that differ from one design to the next. Principally,
the designer will be concerned with whether components can
be mounted on both sides of the circuit board, whether
through-hole components are permitted, the total board space
available for power-supply circuitry, and the maximum amount
of load current. Generally speaking, the most economical
solutions are those in which each phase handles between
25A and 30A. All surface-mount designs will tend toward the
lower end of this current range. If through-hole MOSFETs and
inductors can be used, higher per-phase currents are
possible. In cases where board space is the limiting
constraint, current can be pushed as high as 40A per phase,
but these designs require heat sinks and forced air to cool the
MOSFETs, inductors and heat-dissipating surfaces.
MOSFETS
The choice of MOSFETs depends on the current each
MOSFET will be required to conduct, the switching frequency,
the capability of the MOSFETs to dissipate heat, and the
availability and nature of heat sinking and air flow.
LOWER MOSFET POWER CALCULATION
The calculation for power loss in the lower MOSFET is
simple, since virtually all of the loss in the lower MOSFET is
due to current conducted through the channel resistance
(rDS(ON)). In Equation 21, IM is the maximum continuous
output current, IP-P is the peak-to-peak inductor current
(see Equation 2), and d is the duty cycle (VOUT/VIN).
PLOW, 1 = rDS(ON) ⋅
⎛
⎜
⎝
I--M---⎟⎞
N⎠
2
⋅
(
1
–
d
)
+
I--L---,---2P----P-----⋅---(--1-----–-----d----)
12
(EQ. 21)
An additional term can be added to the lower-MOSFET loss
equation to account for additional loss accrued during the
dead time when inductor current is flowing through the
lower-MOSFET body diode. This term is dependent on the
diode forward voltage at IM, VD(ON), the switching
frequency, fS, and the length of dead times, td1 and td2, at
the beginning and the end of the lower-MOSFET conduction
interval respectively.
PLOW, 2
=
VD(ON) ⋅ fS ⋅
⎛
⎜
I--M----
+
I--P-------P---⎟⎞
⋅
⎝N 2 ⎠
td1
+
⎛
⎜
⎜
⎝
I--M----
N
–
I--P---2----P---⎠⎟⎟⎞
⋅
td2
(EQ. 22)
The total maximum power dissipated in each lower MOSFET
is approximated by the summation of PLOW,1 and PLOW,2.
UPPER MOSFET POWER CALCULATION
In addition to rDS(ON) losses, a large portion of the upper-
MOSFET losses are due to currents conducted across the
input voltage (VIN) during switching. Since a substantially
higher portion of the upper-MOSFET losses are dependent on
switching frequency, the power calculation is more complex.
Upper MOSFET losses can be divided into separate
components involving the upper-MOSFET switching times,
the lower-MOSFET body-diode reverse-recovery charge, Qrr,
and the upper MOSFET rDS(ON) conduction loss.
When the upper MOSFET turns off, the lower MOSFET does
not conduct any portion of the inductor current until the
voltage at the phase node falls below ground. Once the
lower MOSFET begins conducting, the current in the upper
MOSFET falls to zero as the current in the lower MOSFET
ramps up to assume the full inductor current. In Equation 23,
the required time for this commutation is t1 and the
approximated associated power loss is PUP,1.
PUP,1 ≈ VIN
⋅
⎛
⎝
-I-M---
N
+
I--P--2-----P--⎠⎞
⋅
⎛
⎜
-t-1--
⎞
⎟
⎝ 2⎠
⋅ fS
(EQ. 23)
At turn on, the upper MOSFET begins to conduct and this
transition occurs over a time t2. In Equation 24, the
approximate power loss is PUP,2.
PUP, 2
≈
VIN
⋅
⎛
⎜
I--M---
⎝N
–
I--P-------P--⎟⎞
2⎠
⋅
⎛
⎜
⎝
-t-2--
⎞
⎟
2⎠
⋅
fS
(EQ. 24)
24
FN6879.0
March 23, 2009