English
Language : 

FAN6921ML Datasheet, PDF (15/23 Pages) Fairchild Semiconductor – Integrated Critical Mode PFC/Quasi-Resonant Current Mode PWM Controller
Functional Description
PFC Stage
Multi-Vector Error Amplifier and THD Optimizer
For better dynamic performance, faster transient
response, and precise clamping on PFC output,
FAN6921ML uses a transconductance type amplifier
with proprietary innovative multi-vector error amplifier
(US Patent 6,900,623). The schematic diagram of this
amplifier is shown in Figure 25. The PFC output voltage
is detected from the INV pin by an external resistor
divider circuit that consists of R1 and R2. When PFC
output variation voltage reaches 6% over or under the
reference voltage of 2.5V, the multi-vector error amplifier
adjusts its output sink or source current to increase the
loop response to simplify the compensated circuit.
+∑
+
Figure 26. Multi-Vector Error Amplifier with
THD Optimizer
Figure 25. Multi-Vector Error Amplifier
The feedback voltage signal on the INV pin is compared
with reference voltage 2.5V, which makes the error
amplifier source or sink current to charge or discharge
its output capacitor CCOMP. The COMP voltage is
compared with the internally generated sawtooth
waveform to determine the on time of PFC gate.
Normally, with lower feedback loop bandwidth, the
variation of the PFC gate on time should be very small
and almost constant within one input AC cycle.
However, the power factor correction circuit operating at
light-load condition has a defect, zero crossing
distortion, that distorts input current and makes the
system’s Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) worse. To
improve the result of THD at light-load condition,
especially at high input voltage, an innovative THD
optimizer (US Patent 7,116,090) is inserted by sampling
the voltage across the current-sense resistor. This
sampling voltage on current-sense resistor is added into
the sawtooth waveform to modulate the on time of PFC
gate, so it is not constant on time within a half AC cycle.
The method of operation between THD optimizer and
PWM is shown in Figure 26. After THD optimizer
processes, around the valley of AC input voltage, the
compensated on time becomes wider than the original.
The PFC on time, which is around the peak voltage, is
narrowed by the THD optimizer. The timing sequences
of the PFC MOS and the shape of the inductor current
are shown in Figure 27. Figure 28 shows the difference
between calculated fixed on time and fixed on time with
THD optimizer during a half AC cycle.
Figure 27. Operation Waveforms of Fixed On Time
with and without THD Optimizer
Figure 28. Calculated Waveforms of Fixed On Time
with and without THD Optimizer During a Half
AC Cycle
© 2010 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation
FAN6921ML • Rev. 1.0.1
15
www.fairchildsemi.com