LTC3736-1 Datasheet, PDF (13/28 Pages) Linear Technology – Dual 2-Phase, No RSENSE Synchronous Controller with Spread Spectrum

U
OPERATIO (Refer to Functional Diagram)
on at the same time, causing current pulses of up to twice
the amplitude of those from a single regulator to be drawn
from the input capacitor. These large amplitude pulses
increase the total RMS current flowing in the input capaci-
tor, requiring the use of larger and more expensive input
capacitors, and increase both EMI and power losses in the
input capacitor and input power supply.
With 2-phase operation, the two controllers of the
LTC3736-1 are operated 180 degrees out of phase. This
effectively interleaves the current pulses coming from the
topside MOSFET switches, greatly reducing the time where
they overlap and add together. The result is a significant
reduction in the total RMS current, which in turn allows the
use of smaller, less expensive input capacitors, reduces
shielding requirements for EMI and improves real world
operating efficiency.
Figure 3 shows qualitatively example waveforms for a
single phase dual controller versus a 2-phase LTC3736-1
system. In this case, 2.5V and 1.8V outputs, each drawing
a load current of 2A, are derived from a 7V (e.g., a 2-cell
Li-Ion battery) input supply. In this example, 2-phase
SW1 (V)
Single Phase
Dual Controller
2-Phase
Dual Controller
LTC3736-1
operation would reduce the RMS input capacitor current
from 1.79A_RMS to 0.91A_RMS. While this is an impressive
reduction by itself, remember that power losses are pro-
portional to I_RMS2, meaning that actual power wasted is
reduced by a factor of 3.86.
The reduced input ripple current also means that less
power is lost in the input power path, which could include
batteries, switches, trace/connector resistances, and pro-
tection circuitry. Improvements in both conducted and
radiated EMI also directly accrue as a result of the reduced
RMS input current and voltage. Significant cost and board
footprint savings are also realized by being able to use
smaller, less expensive, lower RMS current-rated input
capacitors.
Of course, the improvement afforded by 2-phase opera-
tion is a function of the relative duty cycles of the two
controllers, which in turn are dependent upon the input
supply voltage. Figure 4 depicts how the RMS input
current varies for single phase and 2-phase dual control-
lers with 2.5V and 1.8V outputs over a wide input voltage
range.
It can be readily seen that the advantages of 2-phase
operation are not limited to a narrow operating range, but
in fact extend over a wide region. A good rule of thumb for
most applications is that 2-phase operation will reduce the
input capacitor requirement to that for just one channel
operating at maximum current and 50% duty cycle.
SW2 (V)
I_L1
I_L2
I_IN
37361 F03
Figure 3. Example Waveforms for a Single Phase
Dual Controller vs the 2-Phase LTC3736-1
2.0
1.8
1.6
SINGLE PHASE
DUAL CONTROLLER
1.4
1.2
2-PHASE
DUAL CONTROLLER
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 ^VOUT1 ^{= 2.5V/2A}
V_OUT2 = 1.8V/2A
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
INPUT VOLTAGE (V)
37361 F04
Figure 4. RMS Input Current Comparison
37361f
13