English
Language : 

ISL6336D Datasheet, PDF (28/30 Pages) Intersil Corporation – VR11.1, 6-Phase PWM Controller with Phase Dropping,Droop Disabled and Load Current Monitoring Features
ISL6336D
Low capacitance, high-frequency ceramic capacitors are needed
0.3
in addition to the bulk capacitors to suppress leading and falling
edge voltage spikes. The result from the high current slew rates
produced by the upper MOSFETs turn on and off. Select low ESL
ceramic capacitors and place one as close as possible to each
0.2
upper MOSFET drain to minimize board parasitic impedances
and maximize suppression.
0.6
0.1
IL(P-P) = 0
IL(P-P) = 0.5 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.75 IO
00
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DUTY CYCLE (VO/VIN)
FIGURE 23. NORMALIZED INPUT-CAPACITOR RMS CURRENT vs
DUTY CYCLE FOR 2-PHASE CONVERTER
Figures 24 and 25 provide the same input RMS current
information for 3- and 4-phase designs respectively. Use the
same approach to selecting the bulk capacitor type and number,
as previously described.
0.3 IL(P-P) = 0
IL(P-P) = 0.25 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.5 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.75 IO
0.2
0.1
00
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DUTY CYCLE (VO/VIN)
FIGURE 24. NORMALIZED INPUT-CAPACITOR RMS CURRENT vs
DUTY CYCLE FOR 3-PHASE CONVERTER
0.3 IL(P-P) = 0
IL(P-P) = 0.25 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.5 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.75 IO
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DUTY CYCLE (VO/VIN)
FIGURE 25. NORMALIZED INPUT-CAPACITOR RMS CURRENT vs
DUTY CYCLE FOR 4-PHASE CONVERTER
0.4
0.2
IL(P-P) = 0
IL(P-P) = 0.5 IO
IL(P-P) = 0.75 IO
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DUTY CYCLE (VO/VIN)
FIGURE 26. NORMALIZED INPUT-CAPACITOR RMS CURRENT vs
DUTY CYCLE FOR SINGLE-PHASE CONVERTER
MULTIPHASE RMS IMPROVEMENT
Figure 26 is provided as a reference to demonstrate the dramatic
reductions in input-capacitor RMS current upon the
implementation of the multiphase topology. For example,
compare the input RMS current requirements of a 2-phase
converter versus that of a single phase. Assume both converters
have a duty cycle of 0.25, a maximum sustained output current
of 40A, and a ratio of IL(P-P) to IO of 0.5. The single phase
converter would require 17.3ARMS current capacity while the two-
phase converter would only require 10.9ARMS. The advantages
become even more pronounced when output current is increased
and additional phases are added to keep the component cost
down relative to the single phase approach.
Layout Considerations
The following layout strategies are intended to minimize the
impact of board parasitic impedances on converter performance
and to optimize the heat-dissipating capabilities of the
printed-circuit board. These sections highlight some important
practices which should not be overlooked during the layout
process.
Component Placement
Within the allotted implementation area, orient the switching
components first. The switching components are the most critical
because they carry large amounts of energy and tend to generate
high levels of noise. Switching component placement should take
into account power dissipation. Align the output inductors and
MOSFETs such that space between the components is minimized
while creating the PHASE plane. Place the Intersil MOSFET driver
IC as close as possible to the MOSFETs they control to reduce the
parasitic impedances due to trace length between critical driver
input and output signals. If possible, duplicate the same
placement of these components for each phase.
Submit Document Feedback 28
FN8320.0
October 6, 2014