English
Language : 

CN-0243 Datasheet, PDF (4/8 Pages) Analog Devices – High Dynamic Range RF Transmitter Signal Chain Using Single External Frequency Reference for DAC Sample Clock and IQ Modulator LO Generation
CN-0243
Circuit Note
4. To achieve optimal performance from the filter, these
traces should be 100 Ω differential, or 50 Ω per line.
Note that with typical FR4 material, a 50 Ω line results
from a T/W ratio of 2:1.
If higher impedance lines are desired it should be
understood that the impedance of the line is a
nonlinear function of T/W (T = board layer thickness,
W = width of trace). A thinner line results in a higher
impedance line. With typical FR4 layer thicknesses, a
100 Ω line can get very thin, often close to minimum
design constraints. One solution to this is to void the
ground layer underneath the trace and put another
ground layer on the third layer of the PCB. This
effectively doubles T and allows for a wider trace.
DAC_MOD Interface Filter Topology
Figure 5 shows a typical topology which gives a 5th order
maximally flat Butterworth response for a differential input and
output impedance of 100 Ω.. The actual response is given in
Figure 6. This filter uses 4.6 pF capacitors at the source and load.
This magnitude of capacitor value (<20 pF) is typical of filters
with high cutoff frequencies. Parasitics may have a significant
effect on response when using these small capacitor values.
PORT
IP_BB
NUM = 1
L
L1
L = 58.5nH
R = 1pΩ
L
L2
L = 58.5nH
R = 1pΩ
PORT
IP_MOD
NUM = 2
C
C1
C = 4.46893pF
C
C2
C = 14.461762pF
C
C3
C = 4.46893pF
DAC and Distortion Related Spurious Components
The use of DAC interpolation filters by themselves can reduce
the spurious content at the modulator input and, therefore, the
spurious content at RF. However, there may still be significant
spurious content. Figure 7 shows the RF output spectrum of the
IQ modulator under the following conditions;
FLO = 1940 MHz
DAC input data rate = 300 MSPS
DAC interpolation = 4×
DAC NCO frequency = 150 MHz
DAC input IF frequency = 8 MHz
Note that the strongest spurious component (aside from the
fundamental at 2098 MHz) is the 2× component of the DAC
clock at 2400 MHz. This is likely a result of common and
differential mode components of the DAC output containing
some spectrum from the DAC clock. The common-mode
rejection of the IQ modulator input rejects much of this signal,
but it is still contains significant energy. The next two highest
spurs, at 2062 MHz and at 2242 MHz, also seem to be related to
DAC clock spurs. The spur at 2242 MHz is easily recognized as
2 × (DAC clock – DAC fundamental) = 2400 − 158. The spur at
2062 MHz is not so obvious, but looks like (3 × LO) − (3 × DAC
clock) − 158 = 5820 − 3600 − 158. If the analysis is correct, then
we should be able to see significant spur reduction if we can
suppress the common-mode component of the DAC clock at
the IQ modulator inputs.
PORT
IN_BB
NUM = 3
L
L3
L = 58.5nH
R = 1pΩ
L
L4
L = 58.51nH
R = 1pΩ
PORT
IN_MOD
NUM = 4
Figure 5. DAC/Mod Interface Filter Topology, 5th Order Butterworth,
3 dB BW = 220 MHz, 100 Ω Differential Input and Output Impedance
0
–10
–20
–30
–40
–50
–60
–70
0
S1
SPC
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
FREQUENCY (GHz)
Figure 6. Frequency Response of Filter Topology Given in Figure 5
2098MHz
2062MHz
2242MHz
2400MHz
Figure 7. IQ Modulator RF Output with DAC/IQ Mod Filter Absent,
LO = 1940 MHz, DAC Input IF = 8 MHz, DAC NCO = 150 MHz, RF = 2098 MHz
Rev. 0 | Page 4 of 8