English
Language : 

MAX1533A Datasheet, PDF (32/38 Pages) Maxim Integrated Products – High-Efficiency, 5x Output, Main Power-Supply Controllers for Notebook Computers
High-Efficiency, 5x Output, Main Power-Supply
Controllers for Notebook Computers
The 40/60 optimal interleaved architecture of the
MAX1533A/MAX1537A allows the input voltage to go
as low as 8.3V before the duty cycles begin to overlap.
This offers improved efficiency over a regular 180° out-
of-phase architecture where the duty cycles begin to
overlap below 10V. Figure 10 shows the input-capacitor
RMS current vs. input voltage for an application that
requires 5V/5A and 3.3V/5A. This shows the improve-
ment of the 40/60 optimal interleaving over 50/50 inter-
leaving and in-phase operation.
For most applications, nontantalum chemistries (ceram-
ic, aluminum, or OS-CON) are preferred due to their
resistance to power-up surge currents typical of sys-
tems with a mechanical switch or connector in series
with the input. Choose a capacitor that has less than
10°C temperature rise at the RMS input current for opti-
mal reliability and lifetime.
Power-MOSFET Selection
Most of the following MOSFET guidelines focus on the
challenge of obtaining high load-current capability
when using high-voltage (>20V) AC adapters. Low-cur-
rent applications usually require less attention.
The high-side MOSFET (NH) must be able to dissipate
the resistive losses plus the switching losses at both
INPUT CAPACITOR RMS CURRENT
vs. INPUT VOLTAGE
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
IN PHASE
3.0 50/50 INTERLEAVING
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
6
40/60 OPTIMAL
INTERLEAVING
5V/5A AND 3.3V/5A
8 10 12 14 16 18 20
VIN (V)
INPUT RMS CURRENT FOR INTERLEAVED OPERATION
IRMS =
(IOUT5 - IIN)2 (DLX5 - DOL) + (IOUT3 - IIN)2 (DLX3 - DOL) +
(IOUT5 + IOUT3 - IIN)2 DOL + IIN2 (1 - DLX5 - DLX3 + DOL)
DLX5
=
VOUT5
VIN
DLX3
=
VOUT3
VIN
DOL = DUTY-CYCLE OVERLAP FRACTION
INPUT RMS CURRENT FOR SINGLE-PHASE OPERATION
( ) IRMS = ILOAD VOUT (VIN - VOUT)
VIN
Figure 10. Input RMS Current
VIN(MIN) and VIN(MAX). Ideally, the losses at VIN(MIN)
should be roughly equal to the losses at VIN(MAX), with
lower losses in between. If the losses at VIN(MIN) are
significantly higher, consider increasing the size of NH.
Conversely, if the losses at VIN(MAX) are significantly
higher, consider reducing the size of NH. If VIN does
not vary over a wide range, maximum efficiency is
achieved by selecting a high-side MOSFET (NH) that
has conduction losses equal to the switching losses.
Choose a low-side MOSFET (NL) that has the lowest
possible on-resistance (RDS(ON)), comes in a moder-
ate-sized package (i.e., SO-8, DPAK, or D2PAK), and is
reasonably priced. Ensure that the MAX1533A/
MAX1537A DL_ gate driver can supply sufficient cur-
rent to support the gate charge and the current injected
into the parasitic drain-to-gate capacitor caused by the
high-side MOSFET turning on; otherwise, cross-
conduction problems may occur. Switching losses are
not an issue for the low-side MOSFET since it is a zero-
voltage switched device when used in the step-down
topology.
Power-MOSFET Dissipation
Worst-case conduction losses occur at the duty factor
extremes. For the high-side MOSFET (NH), the worst-
case power dissipation due to resistance occurs at
minimum input voltage:
( ) PD (NH
Resistive)
=
⎛
⎝⎜
VOUT
VIN
⎞
⎠⎟
ILOAD
2 RDS(ON)
Generally, use a small high-side MOSFET to reduce
switching losses at high input voltages. However, the
RDS(ON) required to stay within package power-dissi-
pation limits often limits how small the MOSFET can be.
The optimum occurs when the switching losses equal
the conduction (RDS(ON)) losses. High-side switching
losses do not become an issue until the input is greater
than approximately 15V.
Calculating the power dissipation in high-side
MOSFETs (NH) due to switching losses is difficult, since
it must allow for difficult-to-quantify factors that influ-
ence the turn-on and turn-off times. These factors
include the internal gate resistance, gate charge,
threshold voltage, source inductance, and PC board
layout characteristics. The following switching loss cal-
culation provides only a very rough estimate and is no
substitute for breadboard evaluation, preferably includ-
ing verification using a thermocouple mounted on NH:
( )2
VIN(MAX) CRSS fSW ILOAD
PD (NH Switching) =
IGATE
32 ______________________________________________________________________________________