English
Language : 

OPA3691 Datasheet, PDF (17/32 Pages) Burr-Brown (TI) – Triple Wideband, Current-Feedback OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER With Disable
of the circuit for a current-feedback op amp can be treated as
frequency response compensation elements while their ra-
tios set the signal gain. Figure 9 shows the small-signal
frequency response analysis circuit for the OPA3691.
VI
iERR
α
RI
RG
VO
Z(S) iERR
RF
FIGURE 9. Current-Feedback Transfer Function Analysis Circuit.
The key elements of this current-feedback op amp model are:
α → Buffer gain from the noninverting input to the inverting input
RI → Buffer output impedance
iERR → Feedback error current signal
Z(s) → Frequency dependent open-loop transimpedance
gain from iERR to VO
The buffer gain is typically very close to 1.00 and is normally
neglected from signal gain considerations. It will, however, set
the CMRR for a single op amp differential amplifier configura-
tion. For a buffer gain α < 1.0, the CMRR = –20 • log(1 – α)dB.
RI, the buffer output impedance, is a critical portion of the
bandwidth control equation. The OPA3691 is typically 37Ω.
A current-feedback op amp senses an error current in the
inverting node (as opposed to a differential input error volt-
age for a voltage-feedback op amp) and passes this on to the
output through an internal frequency dependent transimped-
ance gain. The Typical Characteristics show this open-loop
transimpedance response. This is analogous to the open-
loop voltage gain curve for a voltage-feedback op amp.
Developing the transfer function for the circuit of Figure 9
gives Equation 1:
VO
VI
=
α1 +
RF
RG


RF
+

RI 1+
RF
RG


=
1+
αNG
RF + RING
Z(S)
Z(S)
(1)

NG

≡

1 +
RF
RG





This is written in a loop-gain analysis format where the errors
arising from a non-infinite open-loop gain are shown in the
denominator. If Z(S) were infinite over all frequencies, the
denominator of Equation 1 would reduce to 1 and the ideal
desired signal gain shown in the numerator would be achieved.
The fraction in the denominator of Equation 1 determines the
frequency response. Equation 2 shows this as the loop-gain
equation:
Z(S) = Loop Gain
RF + RING
(2)
If 20 • log(RF + NG • RI) were drawn on top of the open-loop
transimpedance plot, the difference between the two would
be the loop gain at a given frequency. Eventually, Z(S) rolls off
to equal the denominator of Equation 2 at which point the
loop gain has reduced to 1 (and the curves have intersected).
This point of equality is where the amplifier’s closed-loop
frequency response, given by Equation 1, will start to roll off
and is exactly analogous to the frequency at which the noise
gain equals the open-loop voltage gain for a voltage-feed-
back op amp. The difference here is that the total impedance
in the denominator of Equation 2 may be controlled some-
what separately from the desired signal gain (or NG).
The OPA3691 is internally compensated to give a maximally
flat frequency response for RF = 402Ω at NG = 2 on ±5V
supplies. Evaluating the denominator of Equation 2 (which is
the feedback transimpedance) gives an optimal target of 476Ω.
As the signal gain changes, the contribution of the NG • RI term
in the feedback transimpedance will change, but the total can
be held constant by adjusting RF. Equation 3 gives an approxi-
mate equation for optimum RF over signal gain:
RF = 476Ω − NG RI
(3)
As the desired signal gain increases, this equation will
eventually predict a negative RF. A somewhat subjective limit
to this adjustment can also be set by holding RG to a
minimum value of 20Ω. Lower values will load both the buffer
stage at the input and the output stage if RF gets too low—
actually decreasing the bandwidth. Figure 10 shows the
recommended RF versus NG for both ±5V and a single +5V
operation. The values shown in Figure 10 give a good
starting point for design where bandwidth optimization is
desired.
600
500
400
+5V
300
±5V
200
100
0
0
5
10
15
20
Noise Gain
FIGURE 10. Recommended Feedback Resistor vs Noise Gain.
OPA3691
17
SBOS227E
www.ti.com